Skip Navigation

Industrial Law Journal 2008 37(4):329-346; doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwn017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brodie, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Industrial Law Society; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Mutual Trust and Confidence: Catalysts, Constraints and Commonality

Douglas Brodie*

Correspondence: * University of Edinburgh, email: jbrodie{at}staffmail.ed.ac.uk


   Abstract

The implied obligation of mutual trust and confidence has assumed, in a short space of time, considerable significance within the law of the employment contract. The decision of the House of Lords in Johnson v Unisys [2003] 1 AC 518 demonstrates that statute may serve to constrain its growth. This article explores whether other statutory rights are likely to have a similar impact upon the implied term. The article goes on to explore whether the influence of public law values will constrain mutual trust's capacity to regulate an employer's discretionary powers. The article concludes by asking whether mutual trust's future development may be influenced by the standards and ethics of Human Resource Management.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.