Skip Navigation

Industrial Law Journal 2007 36(4):446-467; doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwm029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barmes, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Industrial Law Society; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Constitutional and Conceptual Complexities in UK Implementation of the EU Harassment Provisions

Lizzie Barmes*

* Queen Mary, University of London

Correspondence: email: e.m.barmes{at}qmul.ac.uk


  Abstract

This essay evaluates implementation in the UK in recent years of EU provisions on discriminatory harassment. From a technical point of view, aspects of the new law are vulnerable to judicial review challenges of various kinds. The correct interpretation of important elements is also unclear. From a principled perspective, these doctrinal complexities are liable to obscure the most important underlying issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.