Skip Navigation

Industrial Law Journal 2007 36(3):287-314; doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwm017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Industrial Law Society; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Judicial Control of the CAC

Bob Simpson*

* Law Department, London School of Economics and Political Science


  Abstract

This article both analyses the courts' decisions on applications for judicial review of CAC determinations under the trade union recognition procedure in Schedule A1 to the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 from 2000 to 2006 and compares this body of case law with the courts' decisions in the late 1970s and early 1980s on applications for judicial review of both decisions of ACAS under the recognition procedure in the Employment Protection Act 1975 and decisions of the CAC under various legislative provisions in that earlier period. It suggests that there is a marked difference in judicial approach and that this reflects a difference in the policies underlying the legislation of the two periods, with the more radical aims of the earlier period attracting a less sympathetic and more interventionist judicial response than has been evident in relation to the Schedule A1 recognition procedure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.