Skip Navigation

Industrial Law Journal 2007 36(3):255-266; doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwm015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCrudden, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Industrial Law Society; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Equality Legislation and Reflexive Regulation: a Response to the Discrimination Law Review's Consultative Paper

Christopher McCrudden*

* Professor of Human Rights Law, Oxford University; Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford; email: christopher.mccrudden@law.ox.ac.uk. This article is a revised version of a paper first presented at the Nabarro/UCL Conference ‘Where is UK Anti-Discrimination Law Going Wrong?’, 14 June 2007. I am grateful to participants for their comments


   Abstract

The publication of the recent Consultation Document, proposing a new legislative framework for a Single Equality Bill for Great Britain, provides the opportunity for consideration of the regulatory approaches that might be adopted in such legislation. The regulatory approaches adopted in previous anti-discrimination legislation are considered, followed by a discussion of a newer approach to regulation, which has been termed ‘reflexive regulation’. This newer form of regulation appears to form the preferred basis for regulation in the Consultation Paper. The potential problems with this method of regulation are examined, in particular the need to ensure that the pre-conditions for effective reflexive regulation are identified and created. It is argued that the Consultation Paper has failed to address this issue, and that several changes need to be made before the use of reflexive regulation in the area of equality is likely to be successful.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.