Skip Navigation

Industrial Law Journal 1999 28(2):171-182; doi:10.1093/ilj/28.2.171
© 1999 by Industrial Law Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Implementing the national minimum wage - the 1999 regulations

B Simpson

London School of Economics, London, UK

Following the article published in the March issue of the Journal, which analysed the National Minimum Wage Act and the draft National Minimum Wage Regulations, which the government put out for consultation in September, the author now updates that article by analysing the two sets of Regulations which the government has in fact produced. The first is the final version of the National Minimum Wage Regulations; the second is the National Minimum Wage Act (Amendment) Regulations. Between them, the regulations significantly alter the impact of the Act. This is done in three main ways. First, certain groups of workers are either excluded from the Act altogether (au pairs, family members working in a family business) or have the Act applied to them in a modified way. Second, the definition of working time has been amended, principally by introducing a fourth type of working time, 'salaried hours work'. Finally, the enforcement provisions of the Act have been diluted, by relieving the employer of the obligation to provide the employee with a minimum wage statement and by reducing the record-keeping obligations of the employer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JIRHome page
R. McCallum
Justice at Work: Industrial Citizenship and the Corporatization of Australian Labour Law
Journal of Industrial Relations, April 1, 2006; 48(2): 131 - 153.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.